Wonders

By Joe Craig, Park Volunteer

โ€œSomewhere, something incredible is waiting to be knownโ€-Carl Sagan

The circus ainโ€™t cominโ€™ to town no more.

A recent issue of Time Magazine announced that, the โ€œGreatest Show on Earthโ€, Ringling Brothers, Barnum and Bailey Circus is going out of business.  For more than 140 years their death-defying acts, exotic animals and antics of clowns have awed, thrilled and amused countless people, but after May 2017, it will all be but a memory.

Why should something so traditional and part of Americaโ€™s landscape go belly up?  Was it the pressures of animal rights activists who managed to coax (or coerce) RBB&B to stop having elephants in its shows?  Did sequins suddenly cost too much?  Did the clowns unionize?

According to the article it was a lack of wonderment on the part of the audiences.

Yes, audiences are far more sophisticated today than in the past, linked as we have been to the greater world, beginning with television then later, computers and the internet.  With the click of a mouse or touch of a screen, what were once exotic animals and people are right before your eyes.  (โ€œOkay, now I see what a camel is.  Who needs to stand on line to see that?  Iโ€™m going back to killing zombies.โ€)

By contrast, the world was a much vaster, more mysterious place for people in the early modern period.  Many people had spent their entire lives but a few miles from their birthplace.  Their horizons were at best encompassed by a town or two, so the glimpse of anything or anyone from another continent was something wondrous to behold.

No matter how small the compass of oneโ€™s life, โ€œwondersโ€ were very much part of the world, some of which were outright frightening.  Comets were portents of great and awe-filling events, Deformed infantsยญ โ€œmonstrous birthsโ€ (from the Latin monstro, to show)ยญ and violent weather events were signs of Divine Anger and Wrath.  Contagious diseases could appear out of the blue to wipe out entire families.  It was a tough old world to put it mildly.

The reason why various phenomena happened at all lacked what weโ€™d call scientific explanations.  Scientific laws familiar to people in the present were certainly in effect, but being unknown or at the very least poorly understood, explanations for phenomena were often rooted in beliefs in what weโ€™d call magic.

Not surprisingly there was a level of credulity on practically every level of society that seems to beg for modern condescension.  Who, today, can really believe that base metals could be transmuted (transformed) into gold?  Or an aged neighbor could have the powers to wreak havoc on you, your worldly goods and household?  Yet in many cases, there seemed to be no other explanation that Something Happened.

Enter the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment whose expressed mission in life was to expunge โ€œsuperstitionโ€.  Those individuals who had the leisure (and required cash) could study the Wide World better.  Medieval Scholasticism gradually gave way to more empirical observations, inquires and collecting of rarities called, appropriately, โ€œcuriositiesโ€.  The โ€œcabinets of curiositiesโ€ of these collectors were truly eclectic gatherings ofยญ to use the scientific phraseยญ stuff and things.

What did they collect?  It might be easier to ask what they didnโ€™t collect.  Rarities of nature were front and center.  Fossil shells (obviously from the Biblical Flood), went side by side with attractive minerals.  Medieval or Roman coins would be next to โ€œcuriously wroughtโ€ items of all sorts.  Antique objects found their way into the mix.  Feathers, claws and other disjecta membra of animals from the far ends of the earth made for exciting additions.  Some collections were made available to the (paying) public.

One such collection could be found at โ€œDr. Salteroโ€™s Coffee-House in Chelsea [London].โ€  The catalogue of the many curios available for viewing sounds more like a flea market than an organized collection of wonders.  The public could feast their eyes upon โ€œThe model of our Blessed Saviourโ€™s sepluchre at Jerusalemโ€ with โ€œAn horizontal sun-dialโ€ and โ€œA Queen Anneโ€™s Farthing on a tobacco stopperโ€.  In the same โ€œGlass-Caseโ€ one could find โ€œSaints, &c. carved in beads of cherry-stonesโ€ cheek by jowl with โ€œThe head of the bull fly, exceedingly rareโ€ and โ€œThe stag fly, very curiousโ€.  It was a salmagundi for the eyes, the rare (โ€œA pair of dice used by the knights templarsโ€), the exotic (โ€œA pack of Chinese cardsโ€), the titillating (โ€œA pair of garters from South Carolinaโ€), the bizarre (โ€œA piece of Q. Catherineโ€™s skinโ€), the reverent (โ€œA painted ribband from Jerusalem, with which our Saviour was tied to the pillar when scourged, with a mottoโ€) and patriotic (โ€œAn enamel of King Charles II, in miniatureโ€), among many other items.

All that, and we havenโ€™t even gotten to the second โ€œGlass-Caseโ€!  Small wonder that even the serious-minded might stop in: Sir Isaac Newton, Hans Sloan (whose own eclectic collections were the foundation of the British Museum) and Benjamin Franklin (maybe not always as serious-minded as Sir Isaac) were known to have visited the Coffee House-cum-Museum.

Saltero seems to have been something of a showman and a doggerel advertisement was attributed to him:

โ€œMonsters of all sorts here are seen,

Strange things in Nature, as they grew so, Some relics of the Sheba Queen, And fragments of the famed Bob Crusoe. Knick-Knacks, too, dangle round the wall,
Some in glass cases, some on the shelf, But whatโ€™s the rarest sight of all?

YOUR HUMBLE SERVANT SHOWS HIMSELF.โ€

Such venues were not confined to Merrie Olde England.  The Anatomy Hall at the University of Leyden offered an eclectic mix of โ€œscientificโ€ displays and curiosities.  A Catalogue Of all the chiefest RARITIES In the Publick ANATOMIE HALL, Of the University of Leyden [1727] gives a tour of the (sometimes grisly) displays.  Apparently there were plenty of bones to be had; โ€œsceletonsโ€ of animals, familiar and exotic were combined with those of a โ€œpiratโ€ [sic], โ€œA Sceleton of a Woman 17 Yeares old who murthered her sonโ€ and โ€œThe Sceleton of a Gardener, that hangโ€™d himselfโ€.  Alongside the anatomical curiosities, there were plenty of items best categorized as โ€œmiscellaneousโ€:  โ€œAn Ungarian [sic] pair of breechesโ€, โ€œSomme monstrous bonesโ€ and โ€œA great Knife, taken from a Rioting fellowโ€ are but a small selection.

By contrast Rackstrowโ€™s Museum on Fleet Street in London had a bit more focus in its collections of figures and anatomical displays.  Showmanship was certainly a major factor, witness the 1791 catalogue which boasted of โ€œA large and very valuable Collection of MOST CURIOUS ANATOMICAL FIGURES AND REAL PREPARATIONS; ALSO FIGURES RESEMBLING LIFE; WITH A GREAT VARIETY OF Natural and Artificial Curiositiesโ€.

The catalogue goes on to describe breathlessly the wonders to be seen in tones that circus promoters would someday emulate: โ€œThe Astonishing and Compleat SKELETON of a full-sized SPERMA-CETI WHALE, being the real bones joined together; nearly seventy feet in length.  The Head, or Skull alone measures sixteen feet, and is computed to weigh THREE TONSโ€ฆโ€; โ€œThe real SKULL of the Hippopotamus, or River-Horse, also called the Sea-Horse, and in the Holy Scripture, the Behemoth; from the River Nile in Egyptโ€; โ€œA Collection of REPTILES highly preserved in SPIRITS, including VIPERS, SNAKES, FROGS, TOADS; particularly fine Specimens of SURINAM-TOADS, with their Young bursting into Birth through the whole Surface of their BACKSโ€.

Visitors wended their way through displays including โ€œA grand Figure of His Late Majesty GEORGE the Second, In His Parliament Robes, coloured to natureโ€ and โ€œA real Ancient MUMMY, in the original caseโ€ฆnear four thousand yearsโ€.  There were also wax figures, stuffed animals, โ€œA Capital Double Convex LENS, or BURNING GLASSโ€ and โ€œA very Powerful Artificial MAGNETโ€, to boot.

One display showed the less pleasant side of the Enlightenment: incipient racism: โ€œA Series of Skulls, in which the GRADATION from the HUMAN SPECIES to that of the BRUTE is very evident, consisting of the Skull of an European or WHITE person; ยญ That of a MULATTO;ยญ and That of an African NEGRO ยญ with Those of APES, MONKETS, BABOONS, &c.โ€

Visitors entering the Fifth Room encountered โ€œANATOMICAL FIGURES and REAL PREPARATIONSโ€.  The figures in question were โ€œmoulded and coloured to Nature; many of them [cast from] Women who have died undeliveredโ€.  Nearby were โ€œreal Ova [fetuses] from Women who have miscarried, beautifully preserved in spiritsโ€.  Further along could be found โ€œA very fine Figure moulded to a man, representing uncoloured the whole of the External Musaclesโ€, โ€œA Cast of the Bowelsโ€, โ€œAn extraordinary large and curious Gall-stoneโ€,โ€œ A cast of the Human Stomach.ยญDitto of the Liver.ยญ Ditto of the Spleenโ€and โ€œthe real Brains of a Man with the Blood-vessels injected, taken whole out of the Skull; and preserved in spiritsโ€.  The displays continued showing enough body parts to keep Victor Frankenstein in business for years.

Itโ€™s very evident that these cabinets of curiosity and early museums were an admixture of learning and outright huskerterism.  Itโ€™s not hard to imagine the hoi poloi rubbing elbows with the more educated at these venues: one drawn by the purple prose of broadsides and the other by the โ€œthirst for learningโ€.  Maybe the natural philosphers regarded the associated ballyhoo as means to bring the Unwashed toward knowledge.

Did the Enlightenment end the ability for humans to wonder?  Maybe.  The motivating spirit of the Enlightenment was to discover, to find out, to really know.  However, the ideal natural philosopher was not given to enthusiasm, a term interchangeable at the time with religious fanaticism and superstition.  Discovery was to be done carefully, soberly and detached.  (That detachment was not expected of those less educated: arguably in a world where You Knew Your Place, keeping the masses awed by the sciences rather than โ€œsuperstitionโ€ was not an undesirable end.)  Wonder was straight-waistcoated.

Perhaps the real decline for wonder comes from simple overkill.  Through the 18th century and beyond, there have been no lack of wonders.    The sheer volume and anticipation of more discoveries have raised the bar for anyone to make an impact on the public.  (Hey, if Ringling Brothers, Barnum and Bailey Circus canโ€™t meet audience expectations, Dr. Salteroโ€™s Coffee House wouldnโ€™t even be in the running.)  People have become jaded because โ€œwondersโ€ have become commonplace.

But although science has taken the mystery out of many thingsยญ comets, for instance are just โ€œdirty snowballsโ€, after allยญ there is still remains the very human capacity for wonder.  That sense of wonder still makes us search for answers, and that is a very Enlightenment ideal.

,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *